Skip to main content

Mormonism Impossible (Part Three): The Greatest Conceivable Being

Latter-Day Saints' monolatrism proves monotheism to be true. 

I recently emailed a member of the LDS because I wanted to see how he might answer my question regarding some material in Mormonism Impossible Part Two. Specifically, I wanted to see what some of them thought about the Law of the Gods.[1] As in, what exactly causes it. Where did this Law that says men can become gods come from? Read my question below:

 

I have questions that lead to other questions about LDS doctrine. I am genuinely curious about how this all makes sense. For starters, I understand that if a member of the church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day saints lives a holy life, that when they die and go on to the celestial kingdom, they become gods. I know that some members shy away from this teaching, but it is what I find in D&C. So, whether or not LDS become a god of their own planet, I am not completely certain, other than what I see in D&C, which seems to teach that this is the case. Since it is the case, and a man must be married in order to achieve this goal according to D&C, then I imagine that heavenly Father, who was once a man, must have inhabited a planet that was at least populated enough to find a wife for himself, was a holy man. So my question is, what is it that makes this law possible? Why is it the case that men become gods? If we go back in time for infinity, and all these men through the billions of years become gods, why is it the case? Who or what made this pattern work this way?

I really want to know the answer to this. Please tell me where I am wrong, and help me understand my ultimate question. Thank you!

 

As I touched on this in Part two, I will argue in this article that this Law in Mormonism not only transcends Mormon doctrine, but it also proves the existence of the Greatest Conceivable Being. But, before we get to that, see the letter I received from my LDS friend below:

 

Thanks for your email. You are not wrong in your statement as extrapolated from the Doctrine & Covenants. It's found in section 132 (verse 20 specifically, among others). One of the beliefs of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is that through the Atonement of Jesus Christ all humankind has the potential to become perfected and that we can ultimately become like our Father in Heaven. How this is possible is frankly beyond my understanding. It would be certainly interesting to know how or why this has worked this way for eons, but the scriptures do not give us this detail. Also, I'm not sure if you were referring to men in the "mankind" sense, or men as in "male." But to be clear, we don't believe that this opportunity is only available to males. Both men and women, married and sealed together, can be perfected together and become exalted like God. I can't imagine this [god-status] is an immediate that thing that happens. I tend to think of it as a gradual progression over eons and eons. We must prove faithful in this short moment of mortality, and if so, we are granted the opportunity to dwell with God and Christ in the Celestial realms for eternity where we can learn to become like Him. And as we are glorified, it only adds to his glory.

This is all really deep doctrine. It's fascinating, but sometimes I feel we can look beyond the mark. What's most important is to focus on how am I doing as a person today? Am I a good husband, father, son, friend, etc.? Am I a disciple of Jesus Christ? Am I keeping the commandments and helping others? etc. etc. I personally feel this mortal life is an opportunity for each of us to align our will with God's will. None of us will be perfect, but we can strive to be better each day.

Hope that helps some.[2],[3]

 

Not only does this answer I received above admit that it is unknown why this Law of the Gods has been this way for "eons," but it also admits that the Mormon scriptures do not explain it. It is something that Mormons are to take a blind trust in. I think the answer here though, comes to us philosophically, which is fairly easy to understand.

 

The Law of the Gods Transcends Mormonism

 

To transcend something means to be or go beyond the range or limits of it. When we talk about God for instance, God transcends the physical limits of the universe, because He created it.[4] He must be outside of the physical universe in order to create it. If God were in the physical universe, then He would have created Himself, which is absurd.

Similarly, the Law of the Gods in Mormonism transcends the gods themselves in Mormonism. We can see this in the letter I received above. The Law of the Gods says that if a person is good enough in their life on earth, that they will become a God (exaltation). But where does this Law come from? It seems that no one can answer this question. This Law transcends the collection of gods in Mormonism who were once human beings. They become gods because of this law. The problem is, this law is nowhere to be found. One might wonder then, that if this law is above those who enter into godhood in Mormonism, is that Law, God? This brings us to our next argument.

 

The Law of the Gods proves the existence of the Greatest Conceivable Being

 

Think of it like this: If the Law of the Gods exists, then there must be a being that transcends this Law. It is a requirement. In other words, for this Law to exist, something must have created the Law in order for this pattern to exist that men become gods (in Mormon theology). We know that all Laws require a Lawgiver. The law to stop at a stop sign was put into effect just like the law of gravity. God finely-tuned this anthropic constant so perfectly that if gravity were more, then life could not exist, and similarly if it were less, then the same result would take place, that life could not exist. 

 

Even if this Law of the Gods were true, then it would ultimately prove that only one God exists, simply because there must be an explanation for this Law to be in existence from eternity past in the first place. Remember, every law requires a lawgiver. So who wrote the Law of the Gods? Who is the cause of this pattern? The answer is that if it were true, then the one true God wrote it. The problem is, this is also absurd. If it were true, it would reduce the doctrine of exaltation in Mormonism to a person becoming something less than what God is, never being able to attain the place where God is, therefore the One God would then be Greater than every other “God.” It would make the Mormonism and the D&C ultimately false, because these teach that men can become “Gods.”[5]

What this means is that if it is true, then Mormonism is false, but if it is not true, then Mormonism is still false (at least as far as the doctrine of exaltation is concerned). So the ultimate cause of the pattern that men become “Gods” in Mormonism, if true, proves that there is only one true God, which creates a bunch of logical, philosophical, and theological problems in Mormon doctrine as we can see, but also the ultimate cause of this pattern that men become “Gods” transcends those who become “Gods” themselves, which really makes one wonder how much of a “God” a person can really become if there is something that transcends them. On top of all of this, it shows what a low view of God Mormons seem to really have about their deity.

 

For more, see my book on Mormonism: 


 https://www.amazon.com/Mormonism-Refuting-Fundamental-Apologetics-Latter-Day/dp/1662885377/  


Written by Nace Howell through the grace of the Lord Jesus

 © Nace Howell, 2022 



[1] Another way to put this would be “the cause of the pattern.”

[2] This is the letter in its entirety, minus greetings.

[3] Emphasis mine.

[4] See John 1:1-3.

[5] See D&C 132:19-29 (focus on v. 20).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Show a Mormon the Difference Between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus

I find that Mormons frequently claim they are Christians, and that they want to be referred to as Christians, and they have even recently sought to distance themselves from the word “Mormon.” The problem is, they worship another Jesus, and here is how to show them the difference between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus. Before we get to that, some clarifications are necessary.   The Mormon President Russell Nelson said,    “What’s in a name or, in this case, a nickname? When it comes to nicknames of the Church, such as the “LDS Church,” the “Mormon Church,” or the “Church of the Latter-day Saints,” the most important thing in those names is the absence of the Savior’s name. To remove the Lord’s name from the Lord’s Church is a major victory for Satan. When we discard the Savior’s name, we are subtly disregarding all that Jesus Christ did for us—even His Atonement.” [1]   So, according to Nelson, to call Mormons,  Mormons , is a victory for Satan. So, this also means that to call

Joseph Smith had the same Demon that influenced Muhammad

What does Islam have in common with Mormonism? Seriously, the similarities are uncanny. Like human beings, demons are creatures of habit . The Bible does not tell us much about them, but from what it does tell us, we can learn a lot. Jesus reveals to us some things about their behavior: When the unclean spirit has gone out of a person, it passes through waterless places seeking rest, but finds none. Then it says, ‘I will return to my house from which I came.’ And when it comes, it finds the house empty, swept, and put in order. Then it goes and brings with it seven other spirits more evil than itself, and they enter and dwell there, and the last state of that person is worse than the first… [1]   Jesus clearly knows that demons have typical behaviors. He has seen it many times before. He lets us know that a typical behavior for a demon is that home is where the heart is . When your house crumbles to the ground, you move to a new one. Likewise, when a person dies, the demon is f

The Two Systems: A Confused Definition of Love

A couple years ago I wrote an article called  the Jehovah’s Witness training videos . The article was meant to be humorous in a sense, because there are likely not any actual training videos, but it seems that they have all watched them. We can suspect this because they all often have the same points of conversation. When you talk about the Trinity, they will use the Bible like a machine gun and shoot you with verses. The verses are always the same: Colossians 1:15, Mark 10:18… So, there is an implication that they all have the same information. There is one source from where they gather their patterns and behaviors. Similarly, I think we can see the power behind the system of the world as well. We can see what this power is like by the tracks he leaves behind. The contrast of the two systems is really seen in Revelation 14:8. “Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great, she who made all nations drink the wine of the passion of her sexual immorality.” John is using the word  Babylon  here for

How and Where to Make Divisions

Sometimes, I get asked “Why do you get so up at arms about other religions?” or, “Why do you pick on other religions so much?” I think the following will help you see where I’m coming from, before I spill the beans on such.   We have difficulty sometimes in discovering where to make divisions when considering where to spend our money, and who to support, where to make purchases, and where not to do such. We also often have difficulty on how to know if a church or a congregation is a place where someone can actually become saved. Like, how can we know that a Mormon is likely not saved but we can know that a regular church attender at a gospel sound church is likely saved? What is it that would make my church attendance at a specific body no longer appropriate? Both answers to these questions deal with doctrine. If a company is pushing false doctrine using their influence and power to push a heretical doctrine or teaching, this is often when the red flags fly. “Non-essentials” aside for

The Highest Virtue

A virtue is a trait of excellence. What is the highest virtue? It seems that based on the nature of truth, that truth itself is perhaps the highest virtue. For instance, I could say that love is the highest virtue, but then I could ask the question of whether that is true or not. If it is or isn’t true, this places truth virtuously higher than love, at least in some sense. The fact that I can question love through the lens of truth seems to place truth above love in height of virtue. On the other hand, if I said that truth is the highest virtue, then it seems that it would be loving to tell others the truth! Perhaps truth and love go hand in hand, but this also concerns the nature of what truth is.  Truth is a requirement for love, which I argue here , but is love a requirement for truth? Love must contain truth in order to be  true  love. But truth does not have to contain love in order to be true truth. Take for instance, mathematics, or numbers in general… Sometimes, the truth hurts

Defending Christianity against Mormonism

“But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect ” (NIV 1 Peter 3:15). In other words, LOVE THEM . Mormons                                                             Biblical Truths Mormons are monolaters, meaning, they believe in many gods, yet worship only one. LDS believe that “As man is, God once was; and as God is, man may become.” LDS do not believe in Hell. LDS believe God is flesh and bones. LDS believe in baptism for the dead. LDS believe Jesus and Satan are created brothers. LDS do not believe in the Trinity. LDS believe that “it is by grace we are saved, after all we can do” (Nephi 25:23). Deuteronomy 6:4 says, “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one” (See also Isaiah 43:11; Acts 5:4; 1 Timothy 2:5; Exodus 20:3; et. al.). God kn

Objectivity is the Language of Heaven

NDErs (i. e. people who have claimed to have had a   Near Death Experience ) often report that when they go to Heaven, they frequently see and recognize people such as friends and family members. It is often also reported that when they were communicating with friends and relatives, they realized that they weren’t speaking English, but that they were telepathically speaking to one another.   It seems it would be impossible to have communication with others without learning every language that has ever existed under the sun, but since heaven is a perfect place, [1]  then communication should be perfect as well. In other words, it seems unlikely that there are barriers to communication. So, I should be able to communicate with the Apostles, upon my arrival for instance, but how? I personally only really know how to speak English fluently. My Spanish, Japanese, German, Russian, Chinese, and Latin is like that of a child, and my Greek is only in reading and writing.  If communication is me

Argument from Beauty: Evangelical Christians have Neglected a Favorable Catalyst for the Gospel

It seems to me that some Evangelical Christians have taken a biblical passage in the wrong direction. Perhaps I, considering myself to be an Evangelical Christian, am guilty of such as well. Romans 12:1-2 says, “I appeal to you therefore, brothers, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship. Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.”  Verse 2 is where we get the phrase,  be in the world, but don’t be of the world . What this means is that we should know our place. Our place is in heaven. The Bible says that we are citizens of heaven, and that we should think and act as if we are. Philippians 3:20-21 says, “But our citizenship is in heaven, and from it we await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, who will transform our lowly body to be like his glorious body, by the po

Does Baptism Save People from Sin?

There is a lot of confusion, and I would go as far to say that there is a perversion, of baptism in the world today. Some people, such as those in the Church of Christ, teach that baptism is a requirement for salvation. Others say that baptism is something we can do for the dead . But what does the Bible teach about baptism?   Those who say that baptism is a requirement for salvation use verses like 1 Peter 3:21 which says,  baptism which corresponds to this now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a good conscience through the resurrection of Christ Jesus…  This is not talking about soul salvation but being saved from one’s own bad conscience. In other words, by obeying Jesus in getting baptized, we have a good conscience in doing so. Other times some  people  may use Acts 2:37-38 to show that baptism is a requirement for salvation.  Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Brothers,

The Evidence and Power of Testimony

What to say to People who Demand more Evidence for God. Why is there something rather than nothing? Glacier National Park. © Nace Howell, 2018. The question is, how much evidence do you require? Would Jesus have to come back and slap you in the face with evidence that He is God? It seems to me that there is a line we must draw. We do this in all other areas of our lives, so why would we treat theism any different? When a court convicts, they do so “beyond a reasonable doubt.” I would like to take a few moments to explore this a bit. But before we get to that, I want to pose a question, which is… why are you the standard? What makes you think He has to prove His existence to everyone individually? He already created the universe from nothing. In the beginning, there was a big bang. Seriously… do you believe your mom when she tells you a story about her day? Did you believe the reports of 9/11 when they were happening? Do you accept the testimony of anything you hear on social