Skip to main content

What is Apologetics?

“Good philosophy must exist, if for no other reason, because bad philosophy needs to be answered.” –C. S. Lewis

The other day someone said to me that apologetics is a hobby. Is that correct? Is apologetics just a hobby? I have also had someone tell me once that apologetics is not necessary. This was after I had told him that I had a degree in apologetics. Did I spend ten + years of my life on something unnecessary? Many people have the assumption that apologetics is merely arguing with a Mormon or a Jehovah’s Witness or even a Buddhist. But realistically, when one thinks that, he or she is revealing his or her ignorance on apologetics.
Apologetics (Ἀπολογία) is the act of replying with a defense against charges presumed to be false. It is a branch of philosophy which seeks to defend the Christian faith. Some have borrowed the word apologetics in order to explain that they are defending their own religion, such as Islamic apologetics, etc., but we can all agree that apologetics is more than just an answer, as some Bible translations like to put it but it is in fact a defense. So what are we defending? We will get to that in a moment.
One thing we must remember is that apologetics focuses on the person and not simply the argument. We are not getting into a debate in order for debate. That might actually be a hobby, but when apologetics is taken seriously, there is a higher purpose: to reveal the truth. In 1 Timothy, Paul explains to Timothy why he is writing: “I hope to come to you soon, but I am writing these things to you so that, if I delay, you may know how one ought to behave in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, a pillar and buttress of the truth” (1 Timothy 3:14-15; emphasis mine). If 1 Timothy is the blueprint for the church and the church is the pillar and foundation of the truth, then we can conclude that the church should therefore, defend the truth (John 14:6), which is that the gospel is exactly what the Bible says it is. In other words, Timothy is told to “guard the deposit” in 1 Tim. 6:20, which means that he is to protect the precious cargo of the gospel against any type of reduction or mislabeling. The value of the deposit must not change in any way, because it has infinite and priceless value.
If we do not stand guard and oppose the enemy, then we are allowing the enemy to essentially change the truth (which is literally impossible, I know). This is why we fight back with reason and in defense and show people why, for instance, homosexuality and idolatry are moral failures. This is why we reason with other people who try to manipulate the truth of the gospel, such as Jehovah’s Witnesses and Mormons and Scientologists and Christian Scientists, etc.
But if we do not stand up for the truth as Paul so urgently directed Timothy, then what we have built will crumble around us. Think of the theology of the 1950’s for a moment. Not many thought that it was ok to be a homosexual. Why? Because they upheld the understanding of biology and that truth was not what we made it but it was something that we discovered. We discovered for years and years and years that only a male and a female can reproduce, and not two males. But this knowledge was not protected as it should have been. Look where we are today. The truth has not been defended.
Imagine a Christian grandfather in the 50’s from a small town in Minnesota traveling through time and landing in San Francisco in the present year. He would wonder where humanity went wrong! We went wrong in not defending the faith… we went wrong in not guarding the deposit. We built things on foundations other than on Christ (1 Corinthians 3). This is why they crumbled. We need the solid foundation of Christ, the strong foundation of Christ. And in order for that to happen, we need to have a certain amount of knowledge to build.
The point is, people will have itching ears for what they want to hear. Paul addresses this with Timothy as well in his second letter to Timothy (Chapter 4).
Apologetics is necessary in our world. The Millennial generation and those following are generations which continue to ask the questions “Why?” and “How?” As in, “why do we do things the way we do, and why is Christianity the one true religion? Why can’t there be more than one truth? How are people saved who have never even heard of Jesus?”
Apologetics provides evidence for believing the answers to these questions.  In a book Norman Geisler co-authored, he writes, “While evidence itself does not bring about anyone’s salvation, it can be a means through which the efficient work of the Holy Spirit produces salvation in a person’s life.”  Knowing this, then isn’t it of great importance to have apologetic in our armory? If you tell a person who requires evidence in order to believe something to simply have faith, what is that going to do?
I recommend a book by Donald J. Johnson, titled, “How to talk to a Skeptic.” In it, the author explains that the Bible is full of evidenced based faith and once you have the idea that he lays down, it is easy for the reader who is well versed in the Bible to see that no faith in the Bible is something that God simply requires of us through a “blind trust,” as Richard Dawkins, the face of modern atheism, put it. The skeptics and atheists today seem to have more of a blind faith than Christians, simply because there is so much evidence piling up in favor of Christianity.
Johnson explains, for instance, that David goes up against the giant because he already killed a lion and a bear and that the giant Philistine would be no different. David had evidence that he could take the giant down. There is no blind trust involved.
The same thing goes for Christianity. We believe that Jesus died and rose from the dead and performed all of these miracles because of the men who died because of their testimony about Him.
Think of this… if you were driving along and you saw a road-killed animal on the side of the road and for some reason you wanted to pull over and examine the animal and all of the sudden, “there was a sound, and behold, a rattling, and the bones came together, bone to its bone. And [you] looked, and behold, there were sinews on them, and flesh had come upon them, and skin had covered them. But there was no breath in them… and the breath came into them, and they lived and stood on their feet…” (Ezekiel 37:7-8, 10). Imagine what that would do to your life! You saw old beaten up, smelly roadkill come to life! It would absolutely change your world. In fact, you would be so changed that even after you were in a padded institution for 12 years, you still would not be able to stop talking about what you witnessed with your own eyes.
This is what happened with the Disciples of Christ. They saw Him be beaten and murdered and then they witnessed Him resurrected. They couldn’t stop talking about it. Not only that, they talked about it so much that they were murdered themselves. The Disciples of Christ took this truth to their graves. If it were all the biggest prank in the history of the world, they would have confessed at the threat of their death. No one dies without real meaning. We know this. Either people are killed by their own hand because of depression or some other negative reason, or they die of a disease or an accident. No one dies from old age, there is always a reason for death. In any event, there is always a good reason for death. It is never a joke.
Without apologetics, these things would not be understood as they should be. The evidence would not be examined and people would believe through blind trust. In the gospel of John, Jesus is asked by the Pharisees to provide a miracle for them to prove that Jesus was who He showed He was. But the problem with their reasoning in this passage is that Jesus already provided them with proof that He was God. He already gave them bread from heaven by multiplying the loaves and the fish earlier, which is recorded in the same chapter!

Jesus answered them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, you are seeking me, not because you saw signs, but because you ate your fill of the loaves. Do not work for the food that perishes, but for the food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give to you. For on him God the Father has set his seal.” Then they said to him, “What must we do, to be doing the works of God?” Jesus answered them, “This is the work of God, that you believe in him whom he has sent.” So they said to him, “Then what sign do you do, that we may see and believe you? What work do you perform? Our fathers ate the manna in the wilderness; as it is written, ‘He gave them bread from heaven to eat.’” Jesus then said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, it was not Moses who gave you the bread from heaven, but my Father gives you the true bread from heaven. For the bread of God is he who comes down from heaven and gives life to the world.” They said to him, “Sir, give us this bread always.”  –John 6:26-34

Apologetics is necessary for pastors, for lay leaders, and for anyone who calls him or herself a Christian, whether they have been a Christian for a day or for ten thousand days. It will help one have confidence in time of doubt, It will help one be a better evangelist, it will help one think critically, and ultimately, it will bring glory to God.

One of them, an expert in the law, tested him with this question: “Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?” Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.”  –Matthew 22:36-37


Written by Nace Howell through the grace of the Lord Jesus

 © Nace Howell, 2022

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Show a Mormon the Difference Between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus

I find that Mormons frequently claim they are Christians, and that they want to be referred to as Christians, and they have even recently sought to distance themselves from the word “Mormon.” The problem is, they worship another Jesus, and here is how to show them the difference between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus. Before we get to that, some clarifications are necessary.   The Mormon President Russell Nelson said,    “What’s in a name or, in this case, a nickname? When it comes to nicknames of the Church, such as the “LDS Church,” the “Mormon Church,” or the “Church of the Latter-day Saints,” the most important thing in those names is the absence of the Savior’s name. To remove the Lord’s name from the Lord’s Church is a major victory for Satan. When we discard the Savior’s name, we are subtly disregarding all that Jesus Christ did for us—even His Atonement.” [1]   So, according to Nelson, to call Mormons,  Mormons , is a victory for Satan. So, this also means that to call

Joseph Smith had the same Demon that influenced Muhammad

What does Islam have in common with Mormonism? Seriously, the similarities are uncanny. Like human beings, demons are creatures of habit . The Bible does not tell us much about them, but from what it does tell us, we can learn a lot. Jesus reveals to us some things about their behavior: When the unclean spirit has gone out of a person, it passes through waterless places seeking rest, but finds none. Then it says, ‘I will return to my house from which I came.’ And when it comes, it finds the house empty, swept, and put in order. Then it goes and brings with it seven other spirits more evil than itself, and they enter and dwell there, and the last state of that person is worse than the first… [1]   Jesus clearly knows that demons have typical behaviors. He has seen it many times before. He lets us know that a typical behavior for a demon is that home is where the heart is . When your house crumbles to the ground, you move to a new one. Likewise, when a person dies, the demon is f

The Two Systems: A Confused Definition of Love

A couple years ago I wrote an article called  the Jehovah’s Witness training videos . The article was meant to be humorous in a sense, because there are likely not any actual training videos, but it seems that they have all watched them. We can suspect this because they all often have the same points of conversation. When you talk about the Trinity, they will use the Bible like a machine gun and shoot you with verses. The verses are always the same: Colossians 1:15, Mark 10:18… So, there is an implication that they all have the same information. There is one source from where they gather their patterns and behaviors. Similarly, I think we can see the power behind the system of the world as well. We can see what this power is like by the tracks he leaves behind. The contrast of the two systems is really seen in Revelation 14:8. “Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great, she who made all nations drink the wine of the passion of her sexual immorality.” John is using the word  Babylon  here for

How and Where to Make Divisions

Sometimes, I get asked “Why do you get so up at arms about other religions?” or, “Why do you pick on other religions so much?” I think the following will help you see where I’m coming from, before I spill the beans on such.   We have difficulty sometimes in discovering where to make divisions when considering where to spend our money, and who to support, where to make purchases, and where not to do such. We also often have difficulty on how to know if a church or a congregation is a place where someone can actually become saved. Like, how can we know that a Mormon is likely not saved but we can know that a regular church attender at a gospel sound church is likely saved? What is it that would make my church attendance at a specific body no longer appropriate? Both answers to these questions deal with doctrine. If a company is pushing false doctrine using their influence and power to push a heretical doctrine or teaching, this is often when the red flags fly. “Non-essentials” aside for

The Highest Virtue

A virtue is a trait of excellence. What is the highest virtue? It seems that based on the nature of truth, that truth itself is perhaps the highest virtue. For instance, I could say that love is the highest virtue, but then I could ask the question of whether that is true or not. If it is or isn’t true, this places truth virtuously higher than love, at least in some sense. The fact that I can question love through the lens of truth seems to place truth above love in height of virtue. On the other hand, if I said that truth is the highest virtue, then it seems that it would be loving to tell others the truth! Perhaps truth and love go hand in hand, but this also concerns the nature of what truth is.  Truth is a requirement for love, which I argue here , but is love a requirement for truth? Love must contain truth in order to be  true  love. But truth does not have to contain love in order to be true truth. Take for instance, mathematics, or numbers in general… Sometimes, the truth hurts

Defending Christianity against Mormonism

“But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect ” (NIV 1 Peter 3:15). In other words, LOVE THEM . Mormons                                                             Biblical Truths Mormons are monolaters, meaning, they believe in many gods, yet worship only one. LDS believe that “As man is, God once was; and as God is, man may become.” LDS do not believe in Hell. LDS believe God is flesh and bones. LDS believe in baptism for the dead. LDS believe Jesus and Satan are created brothers. LDS do not believe in the Trinity. LDS believe that “it is by grace we are saved, after all we can do” (Nephi 25:23). Deuteronomy 6:4 says, “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one” (See also Isaiah 43:11; Acts 5:4; 1 Timothy 2:5; Exodus 20:3; et. al.). God kn

Objectivity is the Language of Heaven

NDErs (i. e. people who have claimed to have had a   Near Death Experience ) often report that when they go to Heaven, they frequently see and recognize people such as friends and family members. It is often also reported that when they were communicating with friends and relatives, they realized that they weren’t speaking English, but that they were telepathically speaking to one another.   It seems it would be impossible to have communication with others without learning every language that has ever existed under the sun, but since heaven is a perfect place, [1]  then communication should be perfect as well. In other words, it seems unlikely that there are barriers to communication. So, I should be able to communicate with the Apostles, upon my arrival for instance, but how? I personally only really know how to speak English fluently. My Spanish, Japanese, German, Russian, Chinese, and Latin is like that of a child, and my Greek is only in reading and writing.  If communication is me

Argument from Beauty: Evangelical Christians have Neglected a Favorable Catalyst for the Gospel

It seems to me that some Evangelical Christians have taken a biblical passage in the wrong direction. Perhaps I, considering myself to be an Evangelical Christian, am guilty of such as well. Romans 12:1-2 says, “I appeal to you therefore, brothers, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship. Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.”  Verse 2 is where we get the phrase,  be in the world, but don’t be of the world . What this means is that we should know our place. Our place is in heaven. The Bible says that we are citizens of heaven, and that we should think and act as if we are. Philippians 3:20-21 says, “But our citizenship is in heaven, and from it we await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, who will transform our lowly body to be like his glorious body, by the po

Does Baptism Save People from Sin?

There is a lot of confusion, and I would go as far to say that there is a perversion, of baptism in the world today. Some people, such as those in the Church of Christ, teach that baptism is a requirement for salvation. Others say that baptism is something we can do for the dead . But what does the Bible teach about baptism?   Those who say that baptism is a requirement for salvation use verses like 1 Peter 3:21 which says,  baptism which corresponds to this now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a good conscience through the resurrection of Christ Jesus…  This is not talking about soul salvation but being saved from one’s own bad conscience. In other words, by obeying Jesus in getting baptized, we have a good conscience in doing so. Other times some  people  may use Acts 2:37-38 to show that baptism is a requirement for salvation.  Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Brothers,

The Evidence and Power of Testimony

What to say to People who Demand more Evidence for God. Why is there something rather than nothing? Glacier National Park. © Nace Howell, 2018. The question is, how much evidence do you require? Would Jesus have to come back and slap you in the face with evidence that He is God? It seems to me that there is a line we must draw. We do this in all other areas of our lives, so why would we treat theism any different? When a court convicts, they do so “beyond a reasonable doubt.” I would like to take a few moments to explore this a bit. But before we get to that, I want to pose a question, which is… why are you the standard? What makes you think He has to prove His existence to everyone individually? He already created the universe from nothing. In the beginning, there was a big bang. Seriously… do you believe your mom when she tells you a story about her day? Did you believe the reports of 9/11 when they were happening? Do you accept the testimony of anything you hear on social