Skip to main content

What is Adultery? Is remarriage ever permitted? What about Spousal Abuse? How do we move forward?


Grizzly Bear track, Rocky Mountains, Montana.

The Seventh Commandment tells us in Exodus chapter twenty to not commit adultery. “You shall
not commit adultery” is verbatim in most popular translations. But what does this mean? It seems that sometimes it is thought that adultery only means unfaithful to one’s spouse. But other times Jesus says things like “Even if you marry someone who has been married then you have committed adultery” (paraphrase of Matthew 5:32).
I think the best way to answer the question of adultery is to think one step further. I think we should answer biblically speaking, the grounds for remarriage. Reaching further would give the argument greater strength.
It seems that the Bible defines three areas for remarriage, but we should continue to refine the standard from which to catapult. In 1 Timothy chapter three, we observe the qualifications of an overseer. In this, Paul says that one of the qualifications must be that he is to be a “Μιᾶς γυναικὸς ἄνδρα” which means in Koine Greek, “one woman man” or a man who is faithful to his wife. The idea of this passage being a man only being married to only one woman his entire life is theologically expelled with logic. For instance, what if the man’s wife died and he remarried? The Bible clearly frees a man to remarry a woman in the event of death in Romans chapter seven, beginning at verse one:

“For I am speaking to those who know the law—that the law is binding on a person only as long as he lives? For a married woman is bound by law to her husband while he lives, but if her husband dies she is released from the law of marriage. Accordingly, she will be called an adulteress if she lives with another man while her husband is alive. But if her husband dies, she is free from that law, and if she marries another man she is not an adulteress.”

If the death has occurred, then the remaining spouse is free to remarry and not sin against God. This is the first of three ways remarriage is not committing adultery. The same author is the author of both of these passages in Romans seven and 1 Timothy chapter three which tells us that he would not logically disagree with himself. One is saying that He must be the husband of one wife, which a lot of people read as “only one wife, ever”; and the other passage is saying that if the husbands’ wife dies, he is free to remarry. So which is it? There is definitely a third horn to the dilemma. The husband of one wife is faithfully translated into the English as “Faithful to his wife” because otherwise, it would be logically inconsistent.
One does not commit adultery by remarriage through death, as mentioned above, and secondly, by unfaithfulness, which we can see biblically in Matthew chapter 19:7-9, which says,

“Why then,” they asked, “did Moses command that a man give his wife a certificate of divorce and send her away?”
Jesus replied, “Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because your hearts were hard. But it was not this way from the beginning. I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery” (emphasis mine).

Theologians sometimes call this the “exception clause.” It seems that there are legalists who believe that this is inserted into the text as an interpolation, but the rest of the Biblical passages on this topic do not logically disagree with what is said here, indicating that this is genuine. The idea is that a person does not commit adultery by divorcing his wife and then marrying someone else on the grounds of infidelity. This is a second means by which a person can be remarried and not commit adultery.
With this, it seems to bring us to the conclusion that there is more to being guilty of adultery than simply infidelity, which I think Jesus answers. We will get to that shortly, but I want to continue with the biblical grounds for remarriage.
A third way that the Bible seems to give ground for remarriage is found in First Corinthians chapter seven:

“To the rest I say this (I, not the Lord): If any brother has a wife who is not a believer and she is willing to live with him, he must not divorce her. 13 And if a woman has a husband who is not a believer and he is willing to live with her, she must not divorce him. 14 For the unbelieving husband has been sanctified through his wife, and the unbelieving wife has been sanctified through her believing husband. Otherwise your children would be unclean, but as it is, they are holy.
15 But if the unbeliever leaves, let it be so. The brother or the sister is not bound in such circumstances; God has called us to live in peace. 16 How do you know, wife, whether you will save your husband? Or, how do you know, husband, whether you will save your wife” (emphasis mine)?

If you didn’t catch what is in there, I would personally call it abandonment. If your spouse abandons you, with a qualifier that she is not a Christian, then you are free to remarry. Paul says in this passage, “The brother or the sister is not bound in such circumstances…” This is interesting because the question becomes, what if she is a Christian? Well, if she was, would she be divorcing her husband (See 1 Corinthians 13:4)? Bear also in mind that you can tell what kind of a tree one is by the fruit that it produces (Matthew 7:15-20). This is the same chapter that tells us how to make good and proper judgments.
So if she claims to be a Christian yet leaves her husband, how do we handle this? Before we answer this, I think we can introduce another sensitive scenario here as well. What if the spouse is in an abusive relationship? This takes a turn from our main point, but needs to be addressed. If someone is in an abusive relationship, they should remove their self (and very likely, their children) at first offense. In a sense, the abusive spouse has abandoned his or her post, and is no longer acting accordingly. On the other hand, from a counseling perspective, I would never encourage someone to divorce their abusive spouse, because “God hates divorce” (NASB Malachi 2:16), which makes me think, there are not a lot of things in the Bible that spell out what God hates. Therefore, I think that counselors having a reverent fear of God is highly appropriate. Because of such, it seems that counseling someone to divorce their husband or wife would be like counseling them to go and steal something. There must, therefore, be another option, which is a separation.
We answer the problem of abandonment of a spouse the same way we answer an abusive spouse. Matthew chapter 18 tells us how to do that in a list of proper steps to take. The first step when a “brother sins against you” is to go to him privately (v. 15). In the case of physical abuse, however, this step must be skipped for obvious reasons. Secondly, if nothing changes, then bring two or three others with you to try to win him back to reality (v. 16). If that does not work, it is time to go public in the church (v. 17). Finally, if none of these steps work out, then you treat him as you would like someone who does not know God or someone whose moral compass is not calibrated (“Gentile or tax collector” v. 18).
So if the spouse abandons you or abuses you, they have clearly done wrong against you. The steps in Matthew 18 are the first place to which we turn in the Bible in either of these events. I realize that there are many different scenarios with either of these situations, but in order to move forward from them, things must be done, steps must be taken. This is a delicate matter in any event, but it is mentally (and possibly physically) healthy to move forward after knowing what the Bible says and hearing from many advisors (Proverbs 15:22).

With everything out in the open and all things considered, we must ask, “Is it good for us to try to find a way that we are not guilty of adultery before the Lord?” What is our purpose in understanding what the Bible says about our remarriage situation? Are we trying to justify ourselves before God?
We need to be very careful about making ourselves out to be clean before God (See Ephesians 2:8-9 and 1 John 1:9). It is good for us to humble ourselves before the Lord (1 Peter 5:5-6). Especially in a situation as fragile as discussed.

Ἠκούσατε ὅτι ἐρρέθη, Οὐ μοιχεύσεις.  ἐγὼ δὲ λέγω ὑμῖν ὅτι πᾶς ὁ βλέπων γυναῖκα πρὸς τὸ ἐπιθυμῆσαι αὐτὴν ἤδη ἐμοίχευσεν αὐτὴν ἐν τῇ καρδίᾳ αὐτοῦ.

Jesus says, “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart” (Matthew 5:28). Now which of us reading these words of Jesus can honestly say that we have never lusted? With the enormity of how frequent this happens in the world, I think Jesus is saying in a sense, “See how desperately you need me!” We are all guilty of adultery (See Romans 3:10-18). Thankfully, we not only do not have to earn our way, but we absolutely cannot (See Romans 3:23 and 6:23 et. al.). Therefore, “Give thanks to the Lord for He is good! His love endures forever!”


Written by Nace Howell through the grace of the Lord Jesus 
© Nace Howell, 2019

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Show a Mormon the Difference Between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus

I find that Mormons frequently claim they are Christians, and that they want to be referred to as Christians, and they have even recently sought to distance themselves from the word “Mormon.” The problem is, they worship another Jesus, and here is how to show them the difference between the Mormon Jesus and the Biblical Jesus. Before we get to that, some clarifications are necessary.   The Mormon President Russell Nelson said,    “What’s in a name or, in this case, a nickname? When it comes to nicknames of the Church, such as the “LDS Church,” the “Mormon Church,” or the “Church of the Latter-day Saints,” the most important thing in those names is the absence of the Savior’s name. To remove the Lord’s name from the Lord’s Church is a major victory for Satan. When we discard the Savior’s name, we are subtly disregarding all that Jesus Christ did for us—even His Atonement.” [1]   So, according to Nelson, to call Mormons,  Mormons , is a victory for Satan. So, this also means that to call

Joseph Smith had the same Demon that influenced Muhammad

What does Islam have in common with Mormonism? Seriously, the similarities are uncanny. Like human beings, demons are creatures of habit . The Bible does not tell us much about them, but from what it does tell us, we can learn a lot. Jesus reveals to us some things about their behavior: When the unclean spirit has gone out of a person, it passes through waterless places seeking rest, but finds none. Then it says, ‘I will return to my house from which I came.’ And when it comes, it finds the house empty, swept, and put in order. Then it goes and brings with it seven other spirits more evil than itself, and they enter and dwell there, and the last state of that person is worse than the first… [1]   Jesus clearly knows that demons have typical behaviors. He has seen it many times before. He lets us know that a typical behavior for a demon is that home is where the heart is . When your house crumbles to the ground, you move to a new one. Likewise, when a person dies, the demon is f

The Two Systems: A Confused Definition of Love

A couple years ago I wrote an article called  the Jehovah’s Witness training videos . The article was meant to be humorous in a sense, because there are likely not any actual training videos, but it seems that they have all watched them. We can suspect this because they all often have the same points of conversation. When you talk about the Trinity, they will use the Bible like a machine gun and shoot you with verses. The verses are always the same: Colossians 1:15, Mark 10:18… So, there is an implication that they all have the same information. There is one source from where they gather their patterns and behaviors. Similarly, I think we can see the power behind the system of the world as well. We can see what this power is like by the tracks he leaves behind. The contrast of the two systems is really seen in Revelation 14:8. “Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great, she who made all nations drink the wine of the passion of her sexual immorality.” John is using the word  Babylon  here for

How and Where to Make Divisions

Sometimes, I get asked “Why do you get so up at arms about other religions?” or, “Why do you pick on other religions so much?” I think the following will help you see where I’m coming from, before I spill the beans on such.   We have difficulty sometimes in discovering where to make divisions when considering where to spend our money, and who to support, where to make purchases, and where not to do such. We also often have difficulty on how to know if a church or a congregation is a place where someone can actually become saved. Like, how can we know that a Mormon is likely not saved but we can know that a regular church attender at a gospel sound church is likely saved? What is it that would make my church attendance at a specific body no longer appropriate? Both answers to these questions deal with doctrine. If a company is pushing false doctrine using their influence and power to push a heretical doctrine or teaching, this is often when the red flags fly. “Non-essentials” aside for

The Highest Virtue

A virtue is a trait of excellence. What is the highest virtue? It seems that based on the nature of truth, that truth itself is perhaps the highest virtue. For instance, I could say that love is the highest virtue, but then I could ask the question of whether that is true or not. If it is or isn’t true, this places truth virtuously higher than love, at least in some sense. The fact that I can question love through the lens of truth seems to place truth above love in height of virtue. On the other hand, if I said that truth is the highest virtue, then it seems that it would be loving to tell others the truth! Perhaps truth and love go hand in hand, but this also concerns the nature of what truth is.  Truth is a requirement for love, which I argue here , but is love a requirement for truth? Love must contain truth in order to be  true  love. But truth does not have to contain love in order to be true truth. Take for instance, mathematics, or numbers in general… Sometimes, the truth hurts

Defending Christianity against Mormonism

“But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect ” (NIV 1 Peter 3:15). In other words, LOVE THEM . Mormons                                                             Biblical Truths Mormons are monolaters, meaning, they believe in many gods, yet worship only one. LDS believe that “As man is, God once was; and as God is, man may become.” LDS do not believe in Hell. LDS believe God is flesh and bones. LDS believe in baptism for the dead. LDS believe Jesus and Satan are created brothers. LDS do not believe in the Trinity. LDS believe that “it is by grace we are saved, after all we can do” (Nephi 25:23). Deuteronomy 6:4 says, “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one” (See also Isaiah 43:11; Acts 5:4; 1 Timothy 2:5; Exodus 20:3; et. al.). God kn

Objectivity is the Language of Heaven

NDErs (i. e. people who have claimed to have had a   Near Death Experience ) often report that when they go to Heaven, they frequently see and recognize people such as friends and family members. It is often also reported that when they were communicating with friends and relatives, they realized that they weren’t speaking English, but that they were telepathically speaking to one another.   It seems it would be impossible to have communication with others without learning every language that has ever existed under the sun, but since heaven is a perfect place, [1]  then communication should be perfect as well. In other words, it seems unlikely that there are barriers to communication. So, I should be able to communicate with the Apostles, upon my arrival for instance, but how? I personally only really know how to speak English fluently. My Spanish, Japanese, German, Russian, Chinese, and Latin is like that of a child, and my Greek is only in reading and writing.  If communication is me

Argument from Beauty: Evangelical Christians have Neglected a Favorable Catalyst for the Gospel

It seems to me that some Evangelical Christians have taken a biblical passage in the wrong direction. Perhaps I, considering myself to be an Evangelical Christian, am guilty of such as well. Romans 12:1-2 says, “I appeal to you therefore, brothers, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship. Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.”  Verse 2 is where we get the phrase,  be in the world, but don’t be of the world . What this means is that we should know our place. Our place is in heaven. The Bible says that we are citizens of heaven, and that we should think and act as if we are. Philippians 3:20-21 says, “But our citizenship is in heaven, and from it we await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, who will transform our lowly body to be like his glorious body, by the po

Does Baptism Save People from Sin?

There is a lot of confusion, and I would go as far to say that there is a perversion, of baptism in the world today. Some people, such as those in the Church of Christ, teach that baptism is a requirement for salvation. Others say that baptism is something we can do for the dead . But what does the Bible teach about baptism?   Those who say that baptism is a requirement for salvation use verses like 1 Peter 3:21 which says,  baptism which corresponds to this now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a good conscience through the resurrection of Christ Jesus…  This is not talking about soul salvation but being saved from one’s own bad conscience. In other words, by obeying Jesus in getting baptized, we have a good conscience in doing so. Other times some  people  may use Acts 2:37-38 to show that baptism is a requirement for salvation.  Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Brothers,

The Evidence and Power of Testimony

What to say to People who Demand more Evidence for God. Why is there something rather than nothing? Glacier National Park. © Nace Howell, 2018. The question is, how much evidence do you require? Would Jesus have to come back and slap you in the face with evidence that He is God? It seems to me that there is a line we must draw. We do this in all other areas of our lives, so why would we treat theism any different? When a court convicts, they do so “beyond a reasonable doubt.” I would like to take a few moments to explore this a bit. But before we get to that, I want to pose a question, which is… why are you the standard? What makes you think He has to prove His existence to everyone individually? He already created the universe from nothing. In the beginning, there was a big bang. Seriously… do you believe your mom when she tells you a story about her day? Did you believe the reports of 9/11 when they were happening? Do you accept the testimony of anything you hear on social